課程資訊
課程名稱
國際法專題
Seminar on Problems of International Law 
開課學期
100-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
蔡季廷 
課號
PS7023 
課程識別碼
322 M4050 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
必修 
上課時間
星期一3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
社科研2 
備註
碩班必修:國際關係。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:20人
外系人數限制:3人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1002_SPIL 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

This is an advanced research seminar on public international law. In the past two centuries, though legal positivism (thus lawyers and conventional legal scholars) dominate the development of international law, both students of new legal realism and political science has begun to rediscover various “political” functions of international law in the past decade. Just to name a few, why and how international law influences states and individual behaviors regardless of lacking of coercive mechanism; why and how conventional functions of sovereignty transforms in the post-World War II era; how to understand the international law in action as opposed to international law in theory. Such “political” revival of the research of international law conducted by both international legal and political science scholars suggests a new demand for international law: a coherent international law research methodology from social science perspectives both theoretically and empirically. In hence, we will spend about half of the semester to look into this new international law methodological trend in this seminar, in addition to some of the conventional international law subjects.
In consistent with the course interests, this seminar is organized in two parts. The first part of the course provides a general theoretical/ methodological introduction to international law. In response to the aforementioned new demand for re-understanding the international law, this part will put emphasis on cultivating each participant’s ability of asking, answering, and interpreting the role of international law, as understood from various methodological and theoretical perspectives. In specific, policy-oriented, rational-choice, and transnational legal process approaches to international law will be explored. The second part of the course offers three selected specialized areas of international law: human rights law, economic law, and the laws of war.
 

課程目標
Apprehension of various public international law theories and methodologies 
課程要求
There are three requirements for you to take this class.
1. Class participation: Each of you is required to lead your fellow classmates to read and discuss reading assignments twice in the semester. You are also expected to participate actively in seminar discussions. It is also your responsibility to check up if I upload any course supplement on the CEIBA. Class participation will comprise 15% of the final grade.
2. Reflection paper: Each of you is required to submit a two-page reflection work: (1) each week for the first part of the course, and (2) each selected topic for the second part of the course. In total, you are required to submit 8 reflection works. You will find that writing reflection papers be very helpful with writing your final research paper. Reflection paper will comprise 20% of the final grade.
3. Final research paper: Each of you is required to write an independent research paper (about 10,000 – 15,000 words), which will comprise 65% of the final grade. Such paper should examine either theoretical/ methodological issue of international law or a combination of both theoretical/ methodological issue and selected topic of international law. An empirical test of international law methodology/ model is also strongly encouraged. An outline of your final research paper should be submitted no later than Week 16. The deadline for the final research paper: TBA.
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
Part I Theories and Methodologies

Week 1 (2/20) Introduction

Week 2 (2/27) 228 Memorial break

Week 3 (3/5) The Rational-choice Perspective (I)
1. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapters 1-2, pp. 1-69

Week 4 (3/12) The Rational-choice Perspective (II)
1. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapters 3-4, pp. 71-181.

Week 5 (3/19) Personal leave for a conference

Week 6 (3/26) New Haven School (I): Policy-oriented Perspective
1. Myres S. McDougal, Harold D. Lasswell and W. Michael Reisman, "The World Constitutive Process of Authoritative Decision," in International Law Essays: A Supplement to International Law in Contemporary Perspective 191 (Myres S. McDougal and W. Michael Reisman ,eds.,1981).
2. W. Michael Reisman, Seigfried Wiessner, and Andrew W. Willard, “The New Haven School: A Brief Introduction,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 32 (2007), pp. 575-582.

Week 7 (4/2) (Tentative) Personal leave for a conference

Week 8 (4/9) New Haven School? (II): International Legal Process Perspective
1. Harold Hongju Koh, "Transnational Legal Process," 75 Nebraska Law Review 181, 181-207 (1996).
2. Harold Hongju Koh, “Is There a ‘New’ New Haven School of International Law?” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 32 (2007), pp. 559-573.

Week 9 (4/16) IR-IL: International Relations and International Law
1. Anne Marie Slaughter, “A Liberal Theory of International Law,” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law (2000), pp. 240-249, and comment by José E. Alvarez, pp. 249-53.
2. Kenneth W. Abbott, “Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy,” Journal of International Law and International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1-2, (2004-2005), pp. 9-34.
3. David Armstrong, Theo Farrell and Hélène Lambert, International Law and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), Chapters 1 and 3, pp. 1-5, 69-113.

Part II Selected Topics

Week 10 (4/23) ECON 1: Method; Development
1. Gregory Shaffer, “A New Legal Realism: Method in International Economic Law Scholarship,” University of Minnesota Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 09-01.
2. Christina Davis and Sarah Blodgett Bermeo, “Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 71 (2009), p. 1033-1049.
3. Helen Milner. 2005. “Globalization, Development, and International Institutions:
Normative and Positive Perspectives,” 3(4) Perspectives on Politics: pp. 833-854.

Week 11 (4/30) ECON 2: Regional Approaches ─ Beyond Trade
1. Joseph Weiler, "The Transformation of Europe," 100 Yale Law Journal 2403-2483 (1991).
2. Robert Howse, "From Politics to Technocracy -- And Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime," 96 American Journal of International Law 94 (2002).
3. Edward D. Mansfield and Eric Reinhardt. 2003. “Multilateral Determinants of
Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading
Arrangements,” 57(4) International Organization: pp. 829-62.

Week 12 (5/7) ECON 3: International Private Investment and its Protection
1. Andrew T. Guzman, "Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties”, 38 Virginia Journal of International Law 639 (1998).
2. Elkins, Zachary, Andrew T Guzman, and Beth A Simmons. 2006. "Competing for
Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000." 60(4) International Organization: pp. 811-46.
3. Busch, Marc L. (2008). “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and WTO Dispute Settlement,” International Organization, Vol. 61, pp. 735-61.

Week 13 (5/14) RIGHTS 1: UDHR as an Overlapping Consensus?
1. Hersch Lauterpacht, "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights" 25 British Year Book of International Law 354 (1948).
2. Jochen Von Bernstorff, "The Changing Fortunes of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Genesis and Symbolic Dimensions of the Turn to Rights in International Law," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 903 (2008).
3. His Holiness Benedict XVI Joseph Ratzinger, "Address to the United Nations General Assembly of 18 April 2008," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 920 (2008).
4. Mary Anne Glendon, "Justice and Human Rights: Reflections on the Address of Pope Benedict to the UN," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 925 (2008).

Week 14 (5/21) RIGHTS 2: Effectiveness of Human Rights Treaties
1. Hathaway, Oona A. 2005. “Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 72: 469–536.
2. Oona A. Hathaway, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111 (2001-2002), pp. 1935-2042.
3. Goodman, Ryan, and Derek Jinks, “Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2003), pp. 171-183.

Week 15 (5/28) RIGHTS 3: Democracy
1. Thomas M. Franck, “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 86 (1992).
2. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2005). “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 593-629.
3. Mowbray, Alistair. 2005. "The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights." Human Rights Law Review 5(1): 57-79.

Week 16 (6/4) WAR 1: Jus ad bellum and R2P
Deadline: Final Research Paper Outline to be submitted in class!
1. Mark Zacher. 2001. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force. International Organization 55, 2, Spring 2001, pp. 215-250
2. Ryan Goodman. 2006. “Humanitarian Intervention and Pretexts for War,” 100 American Journal of International Law: pp. 107-141.
3. Gareth Evans, “The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time Has Come… and Gone?” International Relations, Vol. 22, No. 3 (2008), pp. 283-298.

Week 17 (6/11) WAR 2: War on Terror
1. Jonathan I. Charney, “The Use of Force Against Terrorism and International Law,” 95 AM. J. INT’L L. 835-39 (2001).
2. Christine Gray. 2008. “The Use of Force against Terrorism: a new war for a new
century?” in International Law and the Use of Force: pp. 216-253.
3. Antonio Cassese, "Terrorism is Also Disrupting Some Crucial Legal Categories of International Law," 12 European Journal of International Law 993 (2001).
4. Tal Becker, "Introduction" in Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility 1 (Portland: Hart, 2006).

Week 18 (6/18) WAR 3: Jus in bello, Tribunal, and a Taste of Literature
ALSO Time for COFFEE!
1. James D. Morrow. 2007. “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?” 101(3) American Political Science Review: pp. 559-572.
2. Michael J. Gilligan, “Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Regime,” International Organization, Vol. 60 (Fall 2006), pp. 935-967.
3. 86. Theodor Meron, "Shakespeare’s Henry the Fifth and the Law of War," 86 American Journal of International Law 1 (1992).  
參考書目
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題